Saturday, November 06, 2004

Are we in need of a New Reformation?

reform
a new book by Mark Driscoll,
pastor of Mars Hill Church in Seattle


This next week, I, along with our worship guys (Mike D. and Tim J.) are headed to Seattle to go to an Acts 29 "Reformission" conference lead by Mark Driscoll and his church in Seattle. The description of the conference is:
The gospel has the power to transform lives, and indeed our culture. The goal of the Acts 29 Network is to plant churches that effectively reach the emerging generation. To accomplish this, young leaders need to be equipped with a solid theological understanding of the gospel. If our understanding of the gospel is weak, our proclamation and evangelism will be weak and fruitless. The Reformission conference will speak into areas of theological confusion prevalent today.
This conference is unlike any other that we are aware of because it is lead by practitioners and is intensely focused on theological principles as opposed to yet another “how to” conference on methods. It is also inexpensive, and hits the most controversial and urgent theological questions of our day from Open Theism to egalitarianism, the DaVinci Code, new views of the atonement, and new views of Paul.

In my own experience and reading, I have seen three very distinct groups of people who are trying starting new churches that are seriously trying to reach people for Christ.

Group #1, my least favorite group, is the one that is totally pragmatic in its approach. "If it works, let's do it." It is the essense of the "seeker-sensitive" model of church planting - just be contemporary, send out mailers, preach in blue jeans and you'll have instant church! Why this group was so successful in church planting in the late 80's up until about 5 years ago is that it totally bypassed the whole worship wars that were going on. "Don't even waste your time at that church, they're stuck in trying to figure out whether to sing A mighty fortress is our God to the organ, or I love you, Lord. Come to us, we have a band, and play Third Day songs." What these people have brought to the table is the greatness of thinking about how to reach multiple people in a quick way by forging ahead and not being stuck in traditions (1950's traditions, that is). What they don't have is sense of awe and wonder or depth toward the holiness and glory of God. Little Bible training, or heart-felt, soul-satisfying worship, or deep encounters with the Spirit. The picture these churches have painted is "Christianity - Lite" - low on conviction, commitment and knowledge.

Group #2 is similar to Group #1 in that it is eager to make church accessible to the people, but with a total different and in fact, contrary agenda to Group #1. They are a relatively new group of Gen Xers and beyond who are totally into the incarnational, emergent, missiological nature of the church. They love the tradition of the church, but not the 1950's - no, they go back to the pre-reformational times of the mystics in the 550's. They understand the traditional church as legalistic, bound in its traditions (even boomer, Willowcreek traditions), and/or focused on an understanding of God that is very systematic its approach. They hate the consumerism of the mega-church. Their theology of God is very wide open and non-definitional in nature, but their exegesis of the culture is outstanding! What this group brings to the feast of the body of Christ is that they have revived the mystery of God, the awe and beauty of the Lord, and authentic worship. In addition, they have renewed an interest in what I will call a "non-entertainment" style of church, which is what the late 80's to present style of church planting has become.

Group #3 is highly interested in the purity of the gospel, and not so much of its mobility. It sees the church as the 'holder of the truth' and should, therefore, be in a position of 'battle stations' not so much with the outside culture, but with other churches who don't hold a high view of Scripture, or have fudged on doctrine to win people. This group brings so very much what I am appreciative of ~ a high view of the Scripture, of God and of Truth being solid. There is no 'fluff' with this group, and the God who is clearly preached is 100% powerful, 100% true, 100% good and 100% sovereign. I love the theology of God in this group! However, when it comes to their ecclesiology, or engaging, and I mean really engaging with our culture, these churches are viewed as out of touch, irrelevant, or just plain clueless.

Does it have to be this way? Do we have to chose one of these three types to be relevant to our culture? I don't think so. I have been deeply impacted by all three. I dream of a new breed of pastors and church planters that takes theology and biblical thinking REALLY seriously, have deep pragmatic concerns about reaching MANY people, AND is INTENSELY engaged with the pop culture we are currently in. This is what I am personally passionate about! Both the PURITY and the MOBILITY of the gospel are crucial to our being faithful to the calling of "making disciples of all nations..."

And yet, even after thinking about this for almost 20 years, I am still such a beginner at figuring out the wonder, beauty and truth of the gospel mobalized into our culture. I need help! I need more and more conversation partners who love God and love good theology and love people deeply! I can't think of a more important thing for us as pastors and church planters, especially those of us who are interested in the new generation of unchurched, postmodern, people to grapple with ~ How do we bring the gospel, the whole gospel without watering it, altering it, or baptizing it in our culture, to a lost, cynical, and anti-organized-religion society?

As I have been surfing the net, I've been impressed with the way Acts 29 is starting to ask these questions. That is why we will board a plane and suffer for Jesus in Seattle for 4 days this next week. :) It should be a great time of thinking, praying, dreaming and debriefing with Tim and Mike, who I love to process stuff with.

If I can have internet access out there at some coffee shop, I'll be dropping daily blogs of info. If not, I'll regurgitate as much as I can remember when I get back next week. Have a great week!

Steve

6 comments:

Roger Messner said...

Steve, Did you know at the bottom of your post you can click on "Acts 29" and it takes you to: "The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada"? I do not know if that is the same thing as the conference you guys are going to but have a great time anyway. Roger

Roger Messner said...

ps. I am really interested in what you think of one of the key note speakers Chris Seay.

stevetreichler said...

Pat,

I did a little research. This blog entry has:

1,121 words
6,286 characters
15 paragraph breaks
and comprises about 90 lines of text as it was in Microsoft Word doc.

and yet, with all of that, you are able to find the ONE AND ONLY possible double entendre. I absolutely LOVE YOU, MAN!!!

Steve

stevetreichler said...

Roger,

Oops...it should have been http://www.acts29network.org/. My bad. It's fixed now.

On second thought, forget it, I'm going to rock out with the pentacostals!! JK

Trike

Rob Davis said...

I just stumbled onto your blog, but I was wondering if you enjoyed the Reformission conference. I wanted to make it out (from Oklahoma City), but couldn't. (And, did you get to take advantage of the WIFI they have at Mars Hill?)

stevetreichler said...

Robert,

Had a great time out at Mars Hill – and, oh yeah, did get the wifi thing while I was there. Interestingly, though, they shut it off during the sessions, which was alright, except I had decided to skip a session to work on some emails and was unable to.

You can listen to the messages at their website – www.reformission.com

Enjoy Jesus, my friend,

Steve